Effective Communication For Criminal Justice Professionals

IntroductionThe role of police officers is not limited to prevention and investigating of crime or to the apprehension of offenders . They are also censorious in the judicial process , acting both as officers of the law and representing the public perspective of crime . Mcguire (2000 believes that public s teaching of the role of police officers has increased their signifi sightce judicial outcomes and later on the interest of both prosecutors and defense force in examining officers testimonies in apostrophize . Researching for the impact of officers court deposition to the outcome of the discipline , the O . J . Simpson murder trial was a good incident to analyze . For Belrad (2008 , the murder trial of American football celebrity O . J . Simpson is one and only(a) of the best illustrations of how officers testimoni al can impact the court . The long-drawn litigation is one of the most disreput commensurate trials in American history and many believe that one of the round points of the teddy was Officer Mark Fuhrman s tribute which raised the mishap tainted secernate due to discrimination and chemical answer to the public printing press on the resolution of the murder of Nicole chocolate-brown Simpson and Ronald GoldmanBackgroundFuhrman , appearing as a recover for the prosecution , accounted for the inquiring procedures to a lower placetaken upon the discovery of the crime and the evidentiary appealingness against Simpson . His testimony followed the amount mode of police testimony and the prosecutors repeatedly emphasized the committedness of the police force to resolve the lesson and build evidence for the court hearing . However , Fuhrman s testimony during cross interrogative would upset the earlier efforts of the prosecution . In the opening statements of the cross-exam ination , he already expresses a degree of ! person-to-person feeling around the case , admitting that it has been an exhausting process and acknowledging the pressure the police were under to bring the case to court (Court TV , 1995 .

It should be far-famed that Fuhrman acted to relate the processes the police underwent during probe and as an expert witness interpreting the evidence gatheredBelrad (2008 ) believes that though Fuhrman s testimony complied with the requirements of the court for pre- and unquestionable trial , he was not able to fully puddle his credibility . Subsequently , commentators on the case s proceedings tell that there was also less office in the investigation and evidence he presented . The situation was elevate aggravated by his assertion of his 5th Amendment rights when questioned by the defense regarding the preliminary statements and the burster that he manipulated evidence to bring nearly the arrest and trust of the defendant (Court TV , 1995 . Though Furhman neer admits during the proceedings the fairness of the accusations , his using the 5th Amendment in topographic point of responding to the questions implied otherwise (Belrad , 2008EvaluationThe O . J . Simpson trial brought to light the brilliance of police officers testimony in establishing not only the severeness of the indictment save also the credibility of criminal umpire process . In court , officers are perceived to charter custodianship of evidence and as such , there is an expectation that...If you motive to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay