To Kill A MockingBird

Fact or Fiction In the process of entrance To pour down A Mockingbird I established something that is rattling true about the court system and jurist. I came to a rattlingization in court it is not what you know, saw, or perceive except rather what you squirt stand up. Without cogent evidence it is just backchat against vocalise in which case whoever has a more prosperous story will probably entice the case. For example in the book it is just word against word and because the accused earth is b leave out he has a slight respectable reputation and loses the case. This situation is much like real life in the respect that if a man accuses an ex-criminal of take his gold necklace but he has no proof hence the accuser will some likely win just because he is more reputable. This whoremonger happen even if the accuser and defendant both(prenominal) know he didnt take it. The defendant will lack support and olibanum he will be convicted. So the sad truth remains th at its know what you know happened it what you can prove happened. If you cant prove your half of the story then justice will not always prevail.         This also brings up another(prenominal) valuable point, neighborly classes. In both To Kill A Mockingbird and in the U.S. directly there are unsounded fond classes.

at bottom the book the brotherly classes go wealthy people (by Maycombs standards), miserable people, disrespected poor people, and blacks. The U.S., has a social class, that is very different and found much less on race. The U.S. social class is form by the job that you have. com monly the high the job pays the higher you ! are on the social class. In conclusion To Kill A Mockingbird addresses umpteen issues that still exist today even though it was indite 60 years ago. If you urgency to get a in force(p) essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay